We'll be a 3-4 structure which basically means that in your base defense you'll have two outside backers, three d linemen, two inside backers and your secondary would be the same whether you're a 3-4 or a 4-3 with two safeties and two corners. But saying that, we're more of an aggressive style 3-4. We're going to play one-gap defense. We're going to attack block up front. We're going to rush the passer. Our outside backers are going to be what we call edge-setters. They're going to be aggressive. They're going to be coming. They're going to be solid setting the edge on the run but we're going to develop those guys as pass rushers. The inside backers, we're going to call them Mike and Moe, they'll be downhill guys to the ball. But in saying that, we're going to still be multiple and have the ability to match personnel, meaning that if someone adds a third wideout into the game, we can add an extra DB. We could end up playing multiple fronts out of that nickel package -- whether it be four down or three down and go that route.Sounds good. Just make sure you review tackling, you know, just in case.
Monday, January 18, 2010
In His Own Words
Grantham on his scheme:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I love it!
ReplyDeleteI couldnt agree more. Im down for whatever as long as we can get back to the basics and stop tackling Deion style.
ReplyDelete3-4?!? The 3-4?!? What an idiot! I can't believe he wants to run the 3-4!!!! Just kidding. I think it'll be fine, so long as we a) learn how to tackle and b) learn how to cover.
ReplyDeleteGotta like the idea of an aggressive approach to defense. Bama's 3-4 worked out pretty good for them.
ReplyDelete